B. swaseyi | B. trifoliolata | |
---|---|---|
Cheatham 2000 | like ... B. haematocarpa: much branched | rounded shrubs usually rise only 5-15 dm |
Correll & Johnston 1970 | small intricate shrub | with rigid ascending or spreading branches |
Vines 1960 | with erect or spreading branches | evergreen shrub to 10 ft [30 dm] |
Buckley 1870 | much branched | grows in dense clumps ... forming an impenetrable mass when fully grown |
Comparing shrub forms and structural details of our species is difficult without knowledge of each bush's age and history, especially the impact of wildfires, browsing by both cattle and deer, as well as insect depredation (the larvae of the barberry webworm, Omphalocera dentosa). Some differences are clearly the result of microenvironmental conditions; e.g., sun, soil and moisture. I have limited my comparisons below to plants in nearly full sun along the bottomland of our valley, with moisture solely from rain.
Although I found no categorically distinctive characteristics, a number of general tendencies seem valid, with individual exceptions.
Three perspectives of the branch structure of one larger B. swaseyi bush. | ||
---|---|---|
Viewed from directly above. |
Viewed from the side. |
Side view of the base. |
Three perspectives of the branch structure of one larger B. trifoliolata bush. | ||
Viewed from directly above. |
Viewed from the side. |
Side view of the base. |
Two different bushes, with full leaf cover:
B. swaseyi |
B. trifoliolata |
Durand (1972) suggests that browsing by deer may play a role in the size and shape of B. swaseyi (p. 322):
Browsing by deer may account for a dwarfing effect, and the larger bushes may escape pruning of terminals and thereby attain a much greater height.This view is not without merit, but numerous other factors need to be considered. The dense growth habit of B. trifoliolata together with its stiff spiny leaflets creates an impenetrable barrier to browsing during periods of primary long shoot growth following rainy periods. Cattle as well as deer do eat the succulent young shoots, but much less so than with B. swaseyi, with its sparser, smaller and less rigid armament. In a sense B. trifoliolata is perfectly adapted for protection from herbivores.
In contrast, B. swaseyi's primary period of vegetative growth is seasonally triggered, occurring at roughly the same time as flowering and leaf fall of older leaves – making the plant more vulnerable to browsing. This difference might seem to account for the symmetrical rounded habit of B. trifoliolata as opposed to B. swaseyi. But it wouldn't account for height differences, why one species is more subject to dwarfing than the other (if this is in fact true), or what enables B. swaseyi to grow large enough to escape terminal pruning in the first place. Perhaps the answer is to be found in the fact that while B. trifoliolata is ubiquitous in our area, B. swaseyi is mostly found in close association with oaks (and other hardwoods), more often than not on the north side of a live oak motte. (Note the above asymmetrical, north-leaning habit of the large bush in the above picture.) The drip line of large oaks is well mulched and tends to abound in prickly young Ashe juniper, planted by migratory birds, and other brush, some of which is less palatable — an environment both protective and conducive to relatively faster vertical growth.
height | width | height–width ratio | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
average | 15 dm | 19 dm | 1:1.3 | ||||
range | 6-24 dm | (6-) 12–30 dm | (1:0.3-) 1:0.9–1:2.5 |
All but 8 bushes were wider than tall. Only two were taller than wide. And one of these, 18 x 6 dm (1:0.3), had gained height by growing within a Texas persimmon.
8-foot tall B. swaseyi bush (ID S8) | B. trifoliolata that is 5–6 feet tall with lateral branches that droop over a bank another 5–6 feet, producing c. 11 feet of vertical spread — but not a bush 11 feet tall. |
Published maximum heights for our two species vary widely, as shown in the table below. Plank (1893), Durand (1970) and my own experience document B. swaseyi bushes 8 feet tall. On the other hand, I have never seen a B. trifoliolata bush that high, let alone one 11½ feet. The basis for minimum heights listed for a range remain largely a mystery. It is clear why Buckley, who first discovered B. swaseyi in 1866, and Plank listed the total range of plants they had observed. When I did my initial census of B. swaseyi on my 50 acres I arbitrarily decided to only count plants over 18 inches tall purely as matter of convenience. Plants of both species under 2 feet tall have bloomed (and viable seeds were collected from one).
B. trifoliolata | B. swaseyi | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
min | max | min | max | |
Plank 1893 | — | — | 9 dm (3') | 24 dm (8') or more |
Durand 1972 | — | — | — | to 24 dm (8') |
Whittemore 1997 | 10 dm (3.3') | 35 dm (11½') | 10 dm (3.3') | 20 dm (6.6') |
Lynch 1981 | — | — | 9 dm (3') | 12 dm (4') |
Correll & Johnston 1970 | — | 20 dm (6½') or more | — | 10 dm (3.3') or more |
Vines 1960 | — | to 30 dm (10') | — | 9 dm (3') |
Buckley 1870 | 12 dm (4') | 18 dm (6') | 6 dm (2') | 9 dm (3') |
Cheatham 2000 | 5 dm (1½') | 15 dm (5') | — | — |
B. trifoliolata main trunk details. (Largest trunk is 65 mm.) | 90 mm trunk with woodpecker hole |
B. swaseyi main trunk details. (Largest trunk is 55 mm.) | |
The oldest stems of both species are gray to grayish brown, furrowed and scaly. B. swaseyi seems to have slightly deeper furrows and more scaly bark. Both are often white with lichens.
B. trifoliolata stem 14 mm in diameter, two views. |